Generative AI Policy

AKSELERASI : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI requires human accountability, transparency, and protection of confidential information whenever generative artificial intelligence is used in preparing or assessing scholarly work.

Authorship and responsibility. AI tools cannot be listed as authors. Human authors remain responsible for all claims, quotations, references, analyses, and materials in the manuscript, including AI-assisted content.

Disclosure. Substantive AI assistance in generating text, developing research materials, analyzing data, or creating figures must be disclosed. Identify the tool, version where available, and purpose of use. Describe research-related applications in the Method section and writing assistance in an appropriate declaration. Routine spelling and grammar correction alone does not require a separate declaration.

Verification. Authors must verify AI outputs against reliable sources and original research records. AI-generated citations, quotations, findings, or participant statements must not be presented as authentic evidence. Synthetic materials used as part of a legitimate research design must be clearly identified and justified.

Privacy and intellectual property. Authors must not upload protected participant information or confidential materials to external AI services without appropriate authorization and safeguards.

Review and editorial work. Reviewers and editors must not upload confidential submissions or review materials to public generative AI services. AI must not replace their independent scholarly judgment.

Suspected inappropriate AI use is assessed using evidence and author explanations. An automated AI-detection score alone is not sufficient to establish misconduct.