Post-Publication Discussion

AKSELERASI : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI welcomes constructive scholarly discussion of its published articles. Readers may submit questions, methodological critiques, alternative interpretations, or evidence of significant errors to the editorial office.

Submitting a comment. Identify the article by its title and DOI or permanent URL. Explain the issue clearly, provide relevant evidence or references, and disclose any competing interests. Comments should address the published work rather than the personal characteristics of its authors.

Editorial assessment. The editor assesses relevance, accuracy, scholarly value, confidentiality, and the need for an author response. Additional expert advice may be sought where necessary. Comments containing unsupported accusations, abusive language, or unnecessary personal information may be declined.

Author response. Authors may be invited to respond to substantive criticism and clarify their methods or interpretations. Responses should engage directly and respectfully with the evidence and questions raised.

Publication and follow-up. Where appropriate, the journal may publish a scholarly comment, author response, or editorial notice. Not all correspondence will be published. Concerns about reliability or misconduct are handled through the relevant ethics and correction procedures.

Readers may also discuss articles through external scholarly channels. Such discussion does not constitute an official journal statement unless the editorial team explicitly identifies it as one.