Optimalisasi Administrasi Kurikulum dalam Mendukung Kualitas Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/akselerasi.v6i1.884Keywords:
Administrasi Kurikulum, Kualitas Pembelajaran, Sekolah Dasar, manajemen pendidikanAbstract
ABSTRACT
Curriculum administration is an important component in educational management that plays a role in improving the quality of learning in elementary schools. This study aims to analyze the optimization of curriculum administration in supporting the quality of learning at SDN 1 Binakal Bondowoso. This research employed a qualitative approach using a case study design. Data collection techniques included interviews, observations, and documentation involving the principal and teachers as research informants. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results show that the optimization of curriculum administration is carried out through systematic planning of learning instruments, structured learning implementation, and academic supervision conducted by the principal. Well-managed curriculum administration improves teachers' readiness in teaching, encourages the use of varied learning methods, and increases student participation in the learning process. Therefore, effective curriculum administration management becomes an important factor in supporting the improvement of learning quality in elementary schools.
Keywords: curriculum administration, learning quality, elementary school, educational management
ABSTRAK
Administrasi kurikulum merupakan salah satu komponen penting dalam pengelolaan pendidikan yang berperan dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis optimalisasi administrasi kurikulum dalam mendukung kualitas pembelajaran di SDN 1 Binakal Bondowoso. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian studi kasus. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi yang melibatkan kepala sekolah dan guru sebagai informan penelitian. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik reduksi data, penyajian data, serta penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa optimalisasi administrasi kurikulum dilakukan melalui perencanaan perangkat pembelajaran yang sistematis, pelaksanaan pembelajaran yang terstruktur, serta kegiatan supervisi akademik oleh kepala sekolah. Administrasi kurikulum yang dikelola dengan baik mampu meningkatkan kesiapan guru dalam mengajar, penggunaan metode pembelajaran yang variatif, serta meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa dalam proses pembelajaran. Dengan demikian, pengelolaan administrasi kurikulum yang optimal menjadi faktor penting dalam mendukung peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran di sekolah dasar.
Kata kunci: administrasi kurikulum, kualitas pembelajaran, sekolah dasar, manajemen pendidikan
References
Amin, M., & Yusof, M. R. (2019). The role of school leadership in improving curriculum management in primary schools. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12334a
Arifin, I., & Juharyanto. (2018). The implementation of academic supervision in improving teacher performance. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.58854
Bafadal, I. (2017). School principal leadership in improving teacher professional competence. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(6), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2016-0213
Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2021). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219879702
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change in school improvement. Teachers College Record, 118(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800304
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2018). Conceptual and methodological issues in studying school leadership effects. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217745880
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). COVID 19 – school leadership in disruptive times. School Leadership & Management, 40(4), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Lunenburg, F. C. (2018). Curriculum development: Inductive models. Schooling, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32071.83363
Mulyasa, E. (2019). School-based management and curriculum implementation in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(4), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.53333/IJICC2013/545
OECD. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030: Curriculum analysis. OECD Education Working Papers, 205, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1787/2e2b8a9a-en
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2017). Teacher agency in curriculum making. Curriculum Journal, 28(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1292693
Print, M. (2017). Curriculum development and design. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 16(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-017-9215-0
Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (2019). Curriculum development: A guide to practice. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(5), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2019.3703
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nuraeni, Haya, Sugiono Eksantoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
